I am so totally not ever going to be a good reference librarian. I'm taking Humanities Resources this semester online, and she has posted lists of questions we are to answer, one list per week. We're supposed to read the text first, and I guess it's supposed to give us ideas how to look this stuff up. Actually, it has in some cases. It's just that most times I look at the questions and my first instinct is Google. Honestly, I think that with decent query-formation and some intelligent skepticism about source selection, that'd be the easiest way to answer lots of these. Except, we're supposed to be learning other ways to find things. More efficient ways. But really, now. If you wanted to know about Kokopelli, would your first instinct be to seek out some esoteric religious source, or would you just go to Google? Duh.
Page Summary
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 04:33 pm (UTC)I'd go to the books on my bookshelf about Native American Mythos. But I think that's an answer that won't get you points in the course! (I love the little rock paintings of kokopelli and am rather appalled at what modern culture is loading the guy down with. Can you imagine what some foreign future culture would do if they found a cache of crucifixes and didn't know anything about Christianity? Eep!)
I know, I know, this comment doesnt address your post. But as a non-librarian, I hit google first, for the most part, if only to find a pointer towards what to go to next. It's sort of a bluderbuss version of an online dictionary.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-18 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 07:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-19 08:18 pm (UTC)