duh

[luciab]

I am so totally not ever going to be a good reference librarian. I'm taking Humanities Resources this semester online, and she has posted lists of questions we are to answer, one list per week. We're supposed to read the text first, and I guess it's supposed to give us ideas how to look this stuff up. Actually, it has in some cases. It's just that most times I look at the questions and my first instinct is Google. Honestly, I think that with decent query-formation and some intelligent skepticism about source selection, that'd be the easiest way to answer lots of these. Except, we're supposed to be learning other ways to find things. More efficient ways. But really, now. If you wanted to know about Kokopelli, would your first instinct be to seek out some esoteric religious source, or would you just go to Google? Duh.

Comments

[nikulai.livejournal.com]

I tend to think of it more as an encyclopedia / index. A good kicking off point. For example, I had no idea what Kokopelli is, so Google lead me to the overview and gave me pointers to more indepth and scholarly sources. Denying Google as a starting point is tantamount to denying use of the card catalog, IMNSHO.

[luciab.livejournal.com]

This teacher in particular hasn't said anything about not using Google, but others have in other classes. Once burned, you know. And she hasn't given ANY feedback on homework turned in so far, so I have no way of knowing how she'll respond to the times I've already said I used Google. I just figure it's not good to rely on it too much.

[nikulai.livejournal.com]

I suppose... and its one of those non-real world scenarios designed to teach you to use alternate resources...

[luciab.livejournal.com]

Bingo.